Thursday, October 21, 2010

Two articles ASSIGNED!

The Land of the Oz
Stepping carefully into Australia

                The author of this article, Bill Hatcher, writes about his adventure into living in the new land to him from the Colorado Plateau to, Australia.  The place he resides to is just on the outskirts of Sydney, Australia which resembles much of America’s southwest desert.  The great thing for him, however, is that he does not live far from what is called the Australian Bush. The “bush” contains a massive variety of animals including some of the worlds’ most venomous snakes and spiders, which I might add that the spider thing would not be to my favor in any way shape or form.  He asks a very important question to himself for living, and also as a photographer as well.
                Since the author plans to be living in Australia for a few years, “as a photographer who often goes off the beaten path to shoot photos,” he asks, “ is just how dangerous is the Australian countryside.  For his own knowledge, he does much needed background research on the wildlife both where he lives and in the Australian bush.  Something that I found interesting that he had noted is that 11 of the world’s 15 most venomous snakes reside there in Australia, and that is including the sea snake, tai pan, and king brown snake.  It is also full of many other types of wildlife such as tropical birds, much of what you would find in a jungle because the Australian bush is basically a jungle. 
                Bill’s main worry as a photographer, however, will rely on him being careful with his steps and observing not only surroundings, but the ground around as well.  Most people whom get bitten by venomous snakes in the bush are generally bitten in the ankle, which can mean only one thing.  For the most part people step on the snake or in its space causing it distress and then it bites.  He explains that most of the snakes in the bush are not aggressive and just reclusive and the disruptions disturb their peace.  The reason a snake could be considered most deadly is because they tend to have more human encounters, Bill explains. 


The Masters of the European Landscapes
England

                The author, William Sawalich, begins the article with the fact that American photographers began the foundations for modern mainstream landscape photography.  In comparison to American landscapes, the author believes that European photographers emphasize intimate landscapes more so than vista.  European photographers as well are concerned more with the form or abstraction and simplicity that are less location sensitive.  In exploration of abstraction he says that the perspectives are less dramatic and the lighting is more quietly portrayed.  Sawalich makes a good point about photography in his eyes, and kind of falls true to photography as I see it as well. 
                What fascinates him about photography is , “How an art form, on one level, the most perfectly descriptive, yet invented by man can transcend the overwhelming weight of bald description to evoke something unexpected. “  I think it’s neat to think about the world in a photographic kind of way, which is how I believe the author means it.  To see many or all of the things you look at and view, and turn it into the vision of a picture.  There are so many plain and simple sights that we see every day, and if we were able to convert that into a picture itself, it would portray much more than what was seen at the time.  This all leads into what the photographer/author says to be his favorite place to photograph.
                “My favourite place to photograph is the one with which I’m emotionally engaged at the time I’m making that image; all other locations pale at that moment.  I feel like the author is very right about his statement.  A picture is only at its best when the photographer him or herself is really feeling the shot and has full confidence that “this is the one”.  Sure, there are many times that you can go out randomly shooting and get a really nice photo, but the true great picture would be that one that you want and emotionally feel enlightened when the shot is achieved.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Iso/shutter/aperture

This night it was around seven to seven thirty, and i decided to try and get some shots of the sunset at Zimmerman Park.  Unfortunately, I left a little too late to get the sunset itself and instead took shots of the sun almost down.  My gaol now was to get the color of the background with the sillouettes of the trees because i felt like that would be a neat idea.  Since it was pretty much dark now, I had to mess with some of the settings on my camera.  I set the ISO to about 400 I believe, which was giving me the best quality shots as far as seeing the whole background color with the sillouettes.  I got a few decent shots with it, but then they were coming out too dark.  In combination with my aperture/exposure going up, my shutter speed would go down.  This gave me a much brighter picture, but then I had a blurred effect because i was not able to hold the camera still without a tripod.  Then i figured out how to speed up my shutter speed and leave the exposure and aperture close to the same.  The result was my second picture down, which came out fairly decently.  My favorite shot of these, however, is the very top one.

5 Favorites

Thursday, September 30, 2010

09/30/2010 blog

This weeks post i decided to try a litle bit on the area of depth of field and layers with my shots.  I was just out shooting different scenes out with my camera while I was at work delivering pizzas.  I know that these are not purely nature shots by any means, but still turned out fairly interestingly.  The first shot that I took happened to be during sundown sometime where the sky was giving off a beautiful orange, pink, red and blue color in which I thought gave the shot its uniqueness along with the fact that the trees added to the shot.  Since it was so bright my camera made the surroundings darker to try and adjust for the light differences. 

The second photo was my favorite of the two because it gives a really nice sense of depth along with illustrating all of the background to come.  Also, the road give you that sense of distance in the shot as well.  I like that this shot shows the fields, distant hills, sky, clouds, and even some other featuressuch as the signs.  The one thing that i wish wasn't there, however, is the car, but it was the best quality shot I had out of all of them.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

9/23 blog


            
This last weekend I took out the camera and decided to play around a little bit more with it to try and figure more things on it.  I took an abundance of close up pictures since I was nowhere near any places with landscapes that weren’t obscured by any buildings.  The three pictures that I have posted in this blog were chosen for a reason.  The detail of my central focus points came out very well and clear, but even more important than that is that the detail is even better.  When I was scoping of what to take pictures of, I was actually just taking these shots as practice for focusing the camera lens and zoom. 
             
After loading all of my shots onto the computer, however, I noticed some really neat things on some of them especially the nub of the tree and little pine branch.  There were all sorts of webbings and things on there that I did not notice by just standing there looking at them.  I came to the realization that some shots can come out even better than you expect just by messing with the settings on the camera and angles.  I took many different angled shots on these because the lighting outside was so bright and yet shaded from the trees.  After moving to the side I was able to use the side light from the sun and get clearer shots of the pine branch and nub. 
           
  Also, layering played an effect that made the shots come out even better as well.  Not only did I get the main object focused on, but I also had a few other elements in the background such as the blurred fence, trees, little bits of lighting and such.  Overall it turned out to be a neat little photo shoot. 

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

The sky

Light is more attractive than dark

Difference draws more attention than conformity

Large draws more attention than small

 Just because I found it to be a lucky shot!